<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Infinite Skies </title>
	<atom:link href="http://pbaughman.com/blog/tag/writing-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pbaughman.com/blog</link>
	<description>Infinite stories, infinite worlds, infinite skies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 18:16:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>First Novel Back from the Editor</title>
		<link>http://pbaughman.com/blog/2015/04/30/first-novel-back-from-the-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://pbaughman.com/blog/2015/04/30/first-novel-back-from-the-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 01:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Baughman]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pbaughman.com/blog/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, my first novel is back from the editor. This was a successful NaNoWriMo &#8217;06 effort and &#8216;finished&#8217; by June of &#8217;07. It was tweaked off and on for the next oh, four or five years and shelved when no agents were interested. Either the idea was *ahem* crap or the proposal was.</p> <p>I finally decided to take the plunge and self-publish, probably as ebook only. The decision was triggered when a tweeter I follow mentioned his editor had some open slots. We talked, and he agreed to take on the manuscript.</p> <p>Three days ago I received the file back. The editor thought  … <a href="http://pbaughman.com/blog/2015/04/30/first-novel-back-from-the-editor/"> more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594; </span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my first novel is back from the editor. This was a successful NaNoWriMo &#8217;06 effort and &#8216;finished&#8217; by June of &#8217;07. It was tweaked off and on for the next oh, four or five years and shelved when no agents were interested. Either the idea was *ahem* crap or the proposal was.</p>
<p>I finally decided to take the plunge and self-publish, probably as ebook only. The decision was triggered when a tweeter I follow mentioned his editor had some open slots. We talked, and he agreed to take on the manuscript.</p>
<p>Three days ago I received the file back. The editor thought the book was good and is awaiting the final product. First independent opinion that my writing isn&#8217;t total crap.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m about to crack open the file and see what needs to be done. I&#8217;ll admit to being a little nervous. Well, okay, a <em>lot</em> nervous, but it has to be done.</p>
<p>More to come&#8230;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pbaughman.com/blog/2015/04/30/first-novel-back-from-the-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bechdel Test &#8211; fail</title>
		<link>http://pbaughman.com/blog/2013/01/29/bechdel-test-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://pbaughman.com/blog/2013/01/29/bechdel-test-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Baughman]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23in13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[characterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[characters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pbaughman.com/blog/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend, I saw a reference to the Bechdel Test (one of many links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bechdel_test), which, for anyone unfamiliar, is a test of gender bias. Passing the test is supposed to indicated three-dimensional female characters.</p> <p>The explanation goes like this, your movie (or novel) must have two named, female characters that have a conversation about something <em>other than a man</em>. It can be any subject, even something that is cliched, like shoes or shopping. If not, then you fail the test.</p> <p>It was originally conceived for movies, but I decided to apply it to my first novel to see  … <a href="http://pbaughman.com/blog/2013/01/29/bechdel-test-fail/"> more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594; </span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend, I saw a reference to the Bechdel Test (one of many links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bechdel_test), which, for anyone unfamiliar, is a test of gender bias. Passing the test is supposed to indicated three-dimensional female characters.</p>
<p>The explanation goes like this, your movie (or novel) must have two named, female characters that have a conversation about something <em>other than a man</em>. It can be any subject, even something that is cliched, like shoes or shopping. If not, then you fail the test.</p>
<p>It was originally conceived for movies, but I decided to apply it to my first novel to see how it rated. It failed.</p>
<p>My novel has lots of named female characters, but without going back and rereading the whole thing, I can&#8217;t think of an instance where any two of them talk about a non-male-related subject. I could go back and insert a scene with such a conversation, but in a way it feels like cheating. Like I am putting it in just to pass the test.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to think about this some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pbaughman.com/blog/2013/01/29/bechdel-test-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
